Press Conferences / Chronic Failures in the War on Terror
10:30 am – Wednesday 23rd April 2008
Sixty One Whitehall,
London SW1A 2ET


Press release: Chronic failures of US-led "war on terror" bolstering Somali and Afghan extremists

LONDON – The current US-led War on Terror approach is creating a political space in which extremists such as Al-Shabab in Somalia and the Taliban in Afghanistan have become legitimate political actors, said The Senlis Council at the release of its latest report on Wednesday. In its report Chronic Failures of the War on Terror: From Afghanistan to Somalia, The Senlis Council said that a number of abject policy failures of the Bush Administration in Somalia, such as aerial bombings, support of the Ethiopian troops in the country and the ill-timed designation of Al-Shabab as a terrorist organisation had been successfully exploited by the Somali insurgency to boost its support and recruitment bases.

“The lack of strategic acumen present in the “War on Terror” in Somalia and Afghanistan is in fact enabling the spread of the insurgencies present throughout both countries,” said Norine MacDonald QC, President and Lead Field Researcher of The Senlis Council. “The United States is the common denominator in both countries – instead of containing the extremist elements in Somalia and Afghanistan, US policies have facilitated the expansion of territory that Al-Shabab and the Taliban have psychological control over.”

“The international community is complicit in Somalia’s troubles, standing idly by as the United States continues with its failed and inflammatory policies,” added Paul Burton, Director of Policy Analysis at The Senlis Council.

“President Bush has the perfect opportunity to adorn the twilight of his final term in office with a success story in his self-proclaimed War on Terror – a Fast Track “Surge for Peace” to end the current Somali crisis.”...
more...


Publication: Chronic Failures in the War on Terror - From Afghanistan to Somalia


Report
April 2008

The Senlis Council has studied the conflict dynamics in Afghanistan for over three years, and has used this as a base to compare the country with another key staging post in the United States’ self-proclaimed ‘War on Terror’ , Somalia. The conflict theatres of Somalia and Afghanistan share a number of similarities, not least regarding the tactics, techniques and motivations utilised by their respective insurgencies. Field research undertaken by The Senlis Council in both countries has enabled the identification of shared dynamics and the interplay between various levels of actor engaged in both conflicts.

These three levels of conflict can interact on any level, and be used to justify the actions of one actor at the expense of another. For instance, in the Afghan context, Pashtun tribes have used the US ‘War on Terror’ as a cover to try and settle old tribal scores by characterising opposing tribes as Taliban sympathisers or part of Al-Qaeda.

Similarly, pre-existing nationalistic struggles have been tapped into by Al-Qaeda/Taliban/Al-Shabab as recruitment tools for their own campaigns.


Full report in English (3,7 Mb, PDF)